jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Recorder: Transaction Control
Date Sat, 18 May 2019 18:58:41 GMT
Hello,

Suggestion about number implemented in :
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63450

Feel free to test it and give feedback using next nightly build.
Thanks
Regards

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:46 PM Alexander Podelko <apodelko@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Thanks for the great feature - 'Recorder: Transaction Control' !
> We have two options there - 'Transaction name' and 'Perfix'. A couple of
> thoughts here.
>
> When we select 'Transaction name', it uses that name for both Transaction
> Controller and ALL sample names underneath. Not optimal approach in my case
> - I'd rather keep urls as sample names (to be able separate them) and use
> the transaction name for Transaction Controller only.
> When we select 'Prefix', it puts it before the number - which, as far as I
> understand here, may mess up sorting in reports etc. So I wonder if putting
> prefix behind the number may be a better option at least in some cases.
> Not saying that these suggestion are better - I guess it shouldn't be a
> big problem to have all 4 options. Or, maybe, some kind of format options -
> where you specify exactly what transaction and sample names would be -
> would be a more generic and elegant solution.
> Just thoughts....
>
> Thanks,Alex
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message