johnzon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>
Subject Re: 1.1.0 status
Date Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:30:03 GMT
Did anyone had a chance to check the signatures for the jsonb API part?

If not I try to do it today.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 29.03.2017 um 09:12 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
> 
> if both spec are aligned with "current" versions +1
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
|
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> 
> 2017-03-29 7:13 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>:
> 
>> Thanks Mark.
>> I'll give it a look but nothing from me so far
>> 
>> Le mar. 28 mars 2017 23:28, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid> a
>> écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi folks!
>>> 
>>> We just finished implementing JSONP-1.1.
>>> 
>>> The sig of geronimo-json-1.1 is now 1:1 with the RI. So we could release
>>> this and ship a johnzon-1.1.0.
>>> Will also check the sig of the jsonb and move it over to geronimo in the
>>> same go.
>>> 
>>> Anything I missed?
>>> 
>>> That means please test it if you find some early showstopper. We will
>>> later ship further versions, so no worry if not all is perfect right now.
>>> 
>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message