kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: as i understand rebalance happens on client side
Date Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:52:16 GMT
I do not understand your question, what are you trying to implement?


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Kane Kane <kane.isturm@gmail.com> wrote:

> So essentially you can't do "queue" pattern, unless you somehow implement
> locking on the client?
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > SimpleConsumer do not have any concept of group management, only the
> > high-level consumers have. So multiple simple consumers can independently
> > consume from the same partition(s).
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Kane Kane <kane.isturm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah, I noticed that, i'm curious how balancing happens if
> SimpleConsumer
> > > is used. I.e. i can provide a partition to read from if i use
> > > SimpleConsumer, but what if someone else already attached to that
> > > partition, what would happen? Also what would happen if one
> > SimpleConsumer
> > > attached to all partitions? Noone would be able to join?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkhede@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are 2 types of consumer clients in Kafka -
> > > ZookeeperConsumerConnector
> > > > and SimpleConsumer. Only the former has the re balancing logic.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Neha
> > > > On Oct 1, 2013 6:30 AM, "Kane Kane" <kane.isturm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > But it looks like some clients don't implement it?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -- Guozhang
> >
>



-- 
-- Guozhang

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message