From users-return-7643-apmail-kafka-users-archive=kafka.apache.org@kafka.apache.org Tue Dec 10 18:20:19 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5382710480 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9031 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2013 18:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-kafka-users-archive@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 8995 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2013 18:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@kafka.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@kafka.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@kafka.apache.org Received: (qmail 8981 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2013 18:20:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of s.abdullah110@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.50] (HELO mail-oa0-f50.google.com) (209.85.219.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:20:12 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so6051183oag.9 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ke6o4Y23vXVuUog3q548IMH7kZbC/zGjz9An3Zdt84o=; b=t1fL0Th+IWhkBe3ohI/S/cg3WmjOwSUzsUrC+UeqVpEguc/ZCOCR+baFfX1VaPBS+e 6iWjKIYYM93Aq7nHV8BmHtlQlzN9CkHsJ3CZmF8xEeBjzLxLt1puizTPtqwqElFygMv5 VNuzwH1v3zMhhb6St8m8Rm2zp50u7EXlELCBk310mKVSHFpkLk185QSUSd8txsei6OSc OSPhgzLDaeKB215vZ7hundmt+hjjosZ3EVs+iuE7pRcdukYhAu52LyDEFR3SvUJK8MDB RjxJP1xL+utIdf5ulfjA0nQyyrmZ5xXm24fqwlYamlDTLfEyLN5PgAGXkzPONaa4Q/Cs K9Gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.33.74 with SMTP id p10mr17821733oei.18.1386699591563; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.19.102 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <51486972.4030204@gmail.com> <52A7441A.6020103@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:19:51 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Anyone working on a Kafka book? From: Shafaq To: users@kafka.apache.org Cc: Steve Morin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115eef890c21104ed32285f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0115eef890c21104ed32285f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Guys, I would love to contribute to the book specially in the portion of Kafka-Spark integration or parts of kafka in general. Am building a Kafka-Spark Real-time framework here at Gree Intl Inc processing order of MBs of data per second. My profile: www.linkedin.com/in/shafaqabdullah/ Let me know, Im open in whatever ways. Regards, S.Abdullah On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:15 AM, chetan conikee wrote: > Hey Guys > > Yes, Ben Lorica (Oreilly) and I are planning to pen a "Beginning Kafka" > book. > We only finalized this late October are hoping to start this mid-month > > Chetan > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Steve Morin wrote: > > > I'll let chetan comment if he's up for it. > > -Steve > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM, David Arthur wrote: > > > >> There was some talk a few months ago, not sure what the current status > is. > >> > >> > >> On 12/10/13 10:01 AM, S Ahmed wrote: > >> > >>> Is there a book or this was just an idea? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Chris Curtin >>> >wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks Jun, > >>>> > >>>> I've updated the example with this information. > >>>> > >>>> I've also removed some of the unnecessary newlines. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Chris > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Chris, > >>>>> > >>>>> This looks good. One thing about partitioning. Currently, if a > message > >>>>> doesn't have a key, we always use the random partitioner (regardless > of > >>>>> what "partitioner.class" is set to). > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Jun > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > > > -- Kind Regards, Shafaq --089e0115eef890c21104ed32285f--