kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stevo Slavić <ssla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Dropping support for Scala 2.9.x
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:34:51 GMT
+1 for dropping 2.9.x support

Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ismael Juma <mlists@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Hi all,
> The Kafka build currently includes support for Scala 2.9, which means that
> it cannot take advantage of features introduced in Scala 2.10 or depend on
> libraries that require it.
> This restricts the solutions available while trying to solve existing
> issues. I was browsing JIRA looking for areas to contribute and I quickly
> ran into two issues where this is the case:
> * KAFKA-1351: "String.format is very expensive in Scala" could be solved
> nicely by using the String interpolation feature introduced in Scala 2.10.
> * KAFKA-1595: "Remove deprecated and slower scala JSON parser from
> kafka.consumer.TopicCount" could be solved by using an existing JSON
> library, but both jackson-scala and play-json require 2.10 (argonaut
> supports Scala 2.9, but it brings other dependencies like scalaz). We can
> workaround this by writing our own code instead of using libraries, of
> course, but it's not ideal.
> Other features like Scala Futures and value classes would also be useful in
> some situations, I would think (for a more extensive list of new features,
> see
> http://scala-language.1934581.n4.nabble.com/Scala-2-10-0-now-available-td4634126.html
> ).
> Another pain point of supporting 2.9.x is that it doubles the number of
> build and test configurations required from 2 to 4 (because the 2.9.x
> series was not necessarily binary compatible).
> A strong argument for maintaining support for 2.9.x was the client library,
> but that has been rewritten in Java.
> It's also worth mentioning that Scala 2.9.1 was released in August 2011
> (more than 3.5 years ago) and the 2.9.x series hasn't received updates of
> any sort since early 2013. Scala 2.10.0, in turn, was released in January
> 2013 (over 2 years ago) and 2.10.5, the last planned release in the 2.10.x
> series, has been recently released (so even 2.10.x won't be receiving
> updates any longer).
> All in all, I think it would not be unreasonable to drop support for Scala
> 2.9.x in a future release, but I may be missing something. What do others
> think?
> Ismael

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message