kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anderson Goulart <anderson.goul...@boxever.com>
Subject Re: SSD or not for Kafka brokers?
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:44:31 GMT
Hi,

You might consider SSD specially for reads - if your consumers are the 
bottleneck (as kafka usually sends sequential bulk messages from memory, 
it won't  add much value to writes). Latency can be also a factor to 
move to SSD (as seek time can vary from 0.2 to 0.8ms on magnetic discs 
compared to 0.1-0.2ms on SSD).

The overall throughput of messages/s was 10% better on SSD (in my tests).


-- Anderson


On 29/07/2016 15:37, Tauzell, Dave wrote:
> In addition for sequential writes, which is common with kafka, SSD isn't much faster
than HDD.
>
> Dave Tauzell | Senior Software Engineer | Surescripts
> O: 651.855.3042 | www.surescripts.com |   Dave.Tauzell@surescripts.com
> Connect with us: Twitter I LinkedIn I Facebook I YouTube
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerard Klijs [mailto:gerard.klijs@dizzit.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 9:33 AM
> To: users@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SSD or not for Kafka brokers?
>
> As I under stood it won't really has any advantage over using HDD since most things will
work from the working memory anyway. You might want to use SSD for zookeeper through.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:19 AM Kessiler Rodrigues <kessiler@callinize.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Should I use SSD for my brokers or not?
>>
>> What are the pros and cons?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may contain sensitive
information, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply
e-mail immediately and destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.


Mime
View raw message