kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Crayford <tcrayf...@heroku.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Vote for KIP-101 - Leader Epochs
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:32:14 GMT
+1

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Gwen Shapira <gwen@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1 - thanks for tackling those old and painful bugs!
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Ben Stopford <ben@confluent.io> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > We’re having some problems with this thread being subsumed by the
> [Discuss] thread. Hopefully this one will appear distinct. If you see more
> than one, please use this one.
> >
> > KIP-101 should now be ready for a vote. As a reminder the KIP proposes a
> change to the replication protocol to remove the potential for replicas to
> diverge.
> >
> > The KIP can be found here:  https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-101+-+Alter+Replication+
> Protocol+to+use+Leader+Epoch+rather+than+High+Watermark+for+Truncation <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 101+-+Alter+Replication+Protocol+to+use+Leader+Epoch+
> rather+than+High+Watermark+for+Truncation>
> >
> > Please let us know your vote.
> >
> > B
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gwen Shapira
> Product Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter | blog
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message