kafka-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnas...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Pulsar and Kafka - Segment Centric vs Partition Centric
Date Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:55:44 GMT
Thanks, Brett.

I am also a Kafka user following a Kafka mailing list and asking help from
Kafka community. Isn't this the place for kafka users to ask questions and
seek help?

Also I am not an infrastructure guy. That's why I was looking to hear
thoughts from Kafka community. I was hoping kafka community is friendly and
the committers can help me understand things clearly which I wasn't 100%
sure about. If I hear to pulsar, why I would come here to ask opinions from
Kafka community. I am here looking for help from Kafka community as why you
are here.

Anyway, I would stick to the original thread if that helps you.


- KN

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Brett Rann <brann@zendesk.com.invalid>
wrote:

> You already have a Pulsar thread going to discuss how it compares with
> Kafka. Maybe you could keep these in the same thread? You seem very
> interested in it which is fantastic.  If you do some reproducible testing
> comparisons I'd be interested in seeing your personal testing methodology
> and results. But if it's just finding some page that is 90% a sales pitch
> of Pulsar, with a footnote at the bottom about kaka, it's not adding much
> more that isn't already suited to the other thread.  My 2c, since I follow
> this list for Kafka information.
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Khurrum Nasim <khurrumnasimm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kafka Community,
> >
> > Has anyone taken a look at this blog post, comparing pulsar and kafka
> from
> > architectural view? I am wondering how you guys think about segment
> centric
> > vs partition centric.
> >
> > https://streaml.io/blog/pulsar-segment-based-architecture/
> > <https://streaml.io/blog/pulsar-segment-based-architecture/>
> >
> > - KN
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message