karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Pax-Web 0.8.1
Date Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:35:19 GMT
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 02:24:22PM +0100, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> first hope you guys had some good holidays :)
> 
> concerning the latest version of pax-web I really would love to use
> the latest snapshot version on trunk of karaf.
> But we currently have not snapshot versions available on any maven repo :(

small correction here: hudson pushes all builds to apache snapshot repo; karafs
latest version (trunk/snapshot) can be found here [1]

[1] http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/karaf/

> 
> second, yes the pax configuration overrides the configuration of the
> jetty xml.
> But just the ones that are passed to jetty by pax. All specialized
> configurations
> jaas as example are only configurable through the jetty xml.
> 
> hope that helped a bit :)
> 
> Am 23.12.2010 14:13, schrieb Charles Moulliard:
> >I found my mistake. I should use the same port number as defined in
> >jetty.xml config file
> >
> >In fact, no new instance is created but pax-web use jetty.xml config
> >if define and override the parameters provided to karaf (port 8181 by
> >example)
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gnodet@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >>Achim has much more experience on using jetty in Karaf than me, so
> >>hopefully he can share some infos.
> >>
> >>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 13:42, Charles Moulliard<cmoulliard@gmail.com>
 wrote:
> >>>pax-web 0.8.2 will be required because pax-web-jetty must import
> >>>classes org.eclipse.jetty.jaas packages for the bundle and those
> >>>classes are not included in pax-web 0.8.1 MANIFEST.mf file
> >>>
> >>>According to the first test that I made, I can register a new jetty
> >>>server using /etc/jetty.xml file but the kareaf webconsole defined
> >>>with port 8181 does not respond...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Guillaume Nodet<gnodet@gmail.com>
 wrote:
> >>>>Sure.  Just make sure you associate the commit with a JIRA issue.
> >>>>
> >>>>On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:28, Charles Moulliard<cmoulliard@gmail.com>
 wrote:
> >>>>>Can I update the pom + feature file ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On 23/12/10 12:15, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >>>>>>Definitely, we should upgrade to the latest version.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thursday, December 23, 2010, Charles Moulliard<cmoulliard@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>  wrote:
> >>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I would like to know if it is planned to include pax-web
0.8.1 in karaf
> >>>>>>>2.2.0 ? I'm interested by this version as it allows to provide
additional
> >>>>>>>parameters for jetty in jetty.xml and configure the location
of this file
> >>>>>>>using config admin or system property
> >>>>>>>(http://issues.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-193)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Regards,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Charles
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>Guillaume Nodet
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>>>------------------------
> >>>>Open Source SOA
> >>>>http://fusesource.com
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Cheers,
> >>Guillaume Nodet
> >>------------------------
> >>Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> >>------------------------
> >>Open Source SOA
> >>http://fusesource.com
> >>
> 

Mime
View raw message