karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: Simplify download page
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:27:28 GMT
Awesome, many thanks :)

Regards
JB

On 02/09/2011 10:24 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 09:56, Guillaume Nodet<gnodet@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Yeah, looks good to me too.
>> I'll try to work on that.  I also plan to add a link to the release
>> notes page for each release, as those are at the top, so it's not
>> really natural to me.
>
> Done and available at https://cwiki.apache.org/KARAF/download.html
> It just occured to me that the release notes for 1.6.0 aren't
> available anymore.  The link points to the felix confluence space, but
> the karaf pages have been removed there, so not sure what to do about
> that.
>
>> I also wonder if we should embed the mirrors combox box as done on the
>> felix download page (http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi) which
>> avoids the intermediate mirror selection.
>
> I think I'll postpone that after the site is migrated fully to scalate
> as I don't want to tweak whatever is needed twice.
>
>> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 09:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net>  wrote:
>>> I think we can split into three parts, regarding our latest discussions:
>>>
>>> Example
>>> 1/ Latest Stable Releases:
>>>         2.1.3 windows/unix
>>>         2.2.0 windows/unix
>>>
>>> 2/ Unstable Release:
>>>         2.99.99-SNAPSHOT windows/unix
>>>
>>> 3/ Previous Releases (on a separate page)
>>>         ...
>>>         ...
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2011 09:41 AM, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree with you on this.
>>>> Still I think it would be nice to list a "history",
>>>> so since this part stays in the wiki, doesn't it?
>>>> We could add an extra sub-page with the history.
>>>>
>>>> wdyt?
>>>>
>>>> Achim
>>>>
>>>> 2011/2/9 Guillaume Nodet<gnodet@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the download page will tend to grow indefinitely if we keep
>>>>> the way it is.
>>>>> I propose we only keep the latest maintenance release for each branch,
>>>>> I think it makes more sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> Open Source SOA
>>>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message