karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jamie G." <jamie.goody...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Global repository (was Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Add Cellar into Karaf trunk)
Date Sun, 08 May 2011 18:40:27 GMT
To be clear the general concept I am ok with, I'm just reviewing
potential issues that should be resolved.

As an enhancement to the concept, I also think that each entry in a
repo file should include a license notice of some sort so that we can
adhere to categories A, B, and X under Apache licensing rules:


On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpieber@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Guillaume,
>>> If we agree on that, I think we should also trim down a bit the
>>> standard descriptor to remove any non core-karaf related features
>>> (such as spring, spring-dm, spring-web, and even war).
>> I like the idea of the repository file, however I don't see war and cellar
>> fall back to this category (imho this is a solution fit for external
>> projects and not sub-projects). This could be a great idea for providing
>> functionality to the minimal distribution, but not on standard.
> TBH I'm with Guaillaume here (although I also share Jamies concerns
> about stability). This is quite similar to what I've described on
> another thread (extracting deployer (spring at least), management,
> web, ...). This will allow us to keep the "karaf-kernel" as small as
> possible. In addition, using this model we can release components
> independent of Karaf.
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>> --
>> *Ioannis Canellos*
>> *
>>  http://iocanel.blogspot.com
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/>  Committer
>> *

View raw message