karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Towards Karaf 3.0.0
Date Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:33:54 GMT
Hopefully I misunderstand you....I think much of this is extreme mission creep.  I don't think
karaf is intended to be in itself a universal server including all known enterprise style
specs.  I think it's a toolkit for making it really easy to assemble an osgi based server
around the stuff you want to do.  I think reorienting the build around the maven plugins that
actually do this is sufficient for 3.0.

thanks
david jencks

On Jul 11, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Charles Moulliard wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Regarding to the content of the release 3.0.0, we should provide not a
> small enhancement based on Karaf 2.x but a real evolution to move
> Karaf into a new area. Doing code cleanup + adding more tests cases +
> web site revamping + documentation improvement will be a big
> achievement but we must deliver new interesting features for target
> projects using it : ServiceMix, Geronimo, ...
> 
> That means that we must in this release :
> - Simplify the deployment process of the different archives (EAR, WAR,
> EBA, JAR, KAR, Spring, Blueprint) and help our end users for doing
> that through Maven, OBR, ... - Question : Do we have to support all of
> them ? Maybe we could restrict the deployment of the required type
> (JAR, Bundle, Spring, Blueprint, WAR ?) and let's project like
> Geronimo to take care about EAR, EJB modules ?
> - Provide a more Enterprise Web Console for operating Karaf -
> configuring DataSource(s), web modules, Security, ...
> - Add admin profile to restrict usage of the Karaf commands as we only
> support right now a full admin access
> - Improve and refactor commands like also the display- e.g. when we
> display all commands --> should be grouped and separate from each
> other, shortcut displayed at the end, ...
> - Provide the strategy to be used to perform unit test/integration
> with Karaf using pax-exam, pax-exam-2, .... or any other solution
> allowing to mock OSGI platform
> - Provide repository of enterprise features (Hibernate, EJB, ...) or
> at least governance rules to allow third party projects to develop
> such features and pass them into a acceptance program to certified
> them according to Karaf releases.
> 
> + 1 for JB propositions + mine improvements of components
> + 1 for a Karaf 3.0 release proposing more enterprise features
> - for RC
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Charles Moulliard
> 
> Apache Committer
> 
> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
> Skype: cmoulliard
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:26 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>> <big snip>
>> 
>>> * Karaf profiles & Kar files (IMHO this is one of the most important
>>> features for 3.x and not present in the issues by now; there had been
>>> considerable work on this by David, but still, we're missing a
>>> possibility to start e.g. CXF without modifying some files in etc)
>> 
>> I'm really hoping that 3.0.0 will have the minimal and standard assemblies created
using kars/features rather than the old style maven-assembly-plugin.  I haven't been able
to work on this for a while but i thought I left it in a state as least as functional as the
old-style servers.  The only bit I recall as missing is the legal files.
>> 
>> What are you looking for to start e.g. cxf?  IIRC you can assemble a server including
a cxf feature as a boot feature, or add it in later as a regular feature....
>> 
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message