karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From " Jean-Baptiste Onofré" ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Towards Karaf 3.0.0
Date Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:00:44 GMT
Sorry my previous e-mail was incomplete (crappy webmail interface).

As I said, I'm fully agree with you.

On the other hand, we shouldn't be too ambitious. I would like to release Karaf 3.0.0 before
end of August, so depending of our availability and the workload, we should be careful with
the things that we have to include.

Regards
JB



On Tue 12/07/11 07:05 , Charles Moulliard  wrote::

Hi,

Regarding to the content of the release 3.0.0, we should provide not a
small enhancement based on Karaf 2.x but a real evolution to move
Karaf into a new area. Doing code cleanup + adding more tests cases +
web site revamping + documentation improvement will be a big
achievement but we must deliver new interesting features for target
projects using it : ServiceMix, Geronimo, ...

That means that we must in this release :
- Simplify the deployment process of the different archives (EAR, WAR,
EBA, JAR, KAR, Spring, Blueprint) and help our end users for doing
that through Maven, OBR, ... - Question : Do we have to support all of
them ? Maybe we could restrict the deployment of the required type
(JAR, Bundle, Spring, Blueprint, WAR ?) and let's project like
Geronimo to take care about EAR, EJB modules ?
- Provide a more Enterprise Web Console for operating Karaf -
configuring DataSource(s), web modules, Security, ...
- Add admin profile to restrict usage of the Karaf commands as we only
support right now a full admin access
- Improve and refactor commands like also the display- e.g. when we
display all commands --> should be grouped and separate from each
other, shortcut displayed at the end, ...
- Provide the strategy to be used to perform unit test/integration
with Karaf using pax-exam, pax-exam-2, .... or any other solution
allowing to mock OSGI platform
- Provide repository of enterprise features (Hibernate, EJB, ...) or
at least governance rules to allow third party projects to develop
such features and pass them into a acceptance program to certified
them according to Karaf releases.

+ 1 for JB propositions + mine improvements of components
+ 1 for a Karaf 3.0 release proposing more enterprise features
- for RC

Regards,

Charles Moulliard

Apache Committer

Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
Skype: cmoulliard



On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:05 AM, David Jencks david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:26 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> 
>
>> * Karaf profiles & Kar files (IMHO this is one of the most important
>> features for 3.x and not present in the issues by now; there had been
>> considerable work on this by David, but still, we're missing a
>> possibility to start e.g. CXF without modifying some files in etc)
>
> I'm really hoping that 3.0.0 will have the minimal and standard assemblies created using
kars/features rather than the old style maven-assembly-plugin.  I haven't been able to work
on this for a while but i thought I left it in a state as least as functional as the old-style
servers.  The only bit I recall as missing is the legal files.
>
> What are you looking for to start e.g. cxf?  IIRC you can assemble a server including
a cxf feature as a boot feature, or add it in later as a regular feature....
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>




Mime
View raw message