karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: karaf-dev & github.com/apache/karaf integration
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2011 08:58:27 GMT
OK got it.

Yeah, why not, it could be interesting.


On 08/19/2011 10:57 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> OK, to make a minor here clear. I never proposed that we apply directly from
> pull-requests (sorry if it was understood that way). Just that we integrate
> it as an optional possibility for code-reveiws.
> E.g. the following workflow would be nice:
> a) a user forks karaf at github
> b) hacks
> c) provides a pull-request
> d) we're notified via the dev-list
> e) as many discussions as required are done via the pull-request<->
> mailinglist (since they are configured to mirror the answers both ways;
> that's the point I propose :-))
> f) the USER rebases his branch on the master/2.2.x; splash the commits to
> one; creates a diff/patch from the one new commit creates an JIRA and
> attaches the patch there
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net>  wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>> The push request is an interesting feature of github.
>> However, Apache requires some rules, especially, if an user provides a
>> patch, he should grant the "ASF donation". It's the only way that we are
>> sure that the user want really donate the code.
>> With a push request, we don't have this step.
>> That's why checking the box in Jira is important. It's legal requirement,
>> especially around IP.
>> Maybe you saw some IP clearance thread. For instance, to migrate a maven
>> plugin from codehaus to apache, we create a Jira containing the whole patch,
>> just to be able to check the "ASF grant" and have a clean IP clearance.
>> Even if it's true that, from a technical point of view, github push request
>> is really great, from an Apache legal point of view, I'm not sure it's
>> applicable.
>> I'm gonna talk with other members to have their point of view.
>> Regards
>> JB
>> On 08/19/2011 06:06 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>> Just because it is annoying me a little bit the last days I would like to
>>> hear your opinion about this before nagging the infrastructure team if
>>> this
>>> is possible at all. The scenario is the following:
>>> While I've absolutely no problem with the current ASF ways (provide
>>> patches
>>> via JIRA&   central SVN) I think it is quite a pain to either review code
>>> and/or discuss ideas&   "code-snippets". On the other hand, with github&
>>>   git
>>> getting bigger and bigger, ASF already with mirrors on github and github
>>> with a REALLY great code review functionality I think the following
>>> feature
>>> could be useful:
>>> if a pull-request is added to our fork at github the typical notification
>>> mail is not send to a unique person but rather to our dev list. If we
>>> reply
>>> on this mail it will be (a) mirrored to the github discussion thread and
>>> (b)
>>> (as the identity of the dev-list I assume) back to the github discussion
>>> thread. If we (or the provider of the request) add a comment to the
>>> discussion thread the notification will be sent to the dev list (same
>>> thread) again. Since this can create some amount of traffic I think this
>>> can
>>> also be a github@karaf.apache.org list. Once we conclude that a
>>> patch-request from an user is good enough the patch could be created and
>>> attached to an JIRA.
>>> IMHO this would make the entire code-review and dicussion process ways
>>> easier and still public accessible and followable by all commiters/devs.
>>> WDYT?
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Andreas
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message