karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jamie G." <jamie.goody...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Promote Cave and WebConsole as Karaf sub-projects
Date Mon, 05 Sep 2011 12:58:44 GMT
+1, a 0.x numbering would suffice until they are ready for 1.0s :)

2011/9/5 Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>:
> +1, nothing else to add :)
>
> 2011/9/5 Charles Moulliard <cmoulliard@gmail.com>:
>> +1.
>>
>> Ok to promote the subproject using the convention recommended by Guillaume 0.x.
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/5 Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>:
>>> I don't really think we need anything like that.   I'd rather release
>>> 0.x to indicate the non mature aspect if we want to, or release an
>>> alpha / beta versions.
>>> The incubator disclaimer is more for IP / legal reasons rather than
>>> maturity, as a lot of very mature code base go into the incubator.
>>>
>>> 2011/9/5 Łukasz Dywicki <luke@code-house.org>:
>>>> Hey,
>>>> As long as relocation doesn't require first release I am ok with it. We can
switch version to 1.0-prototype-SNAPSHOT or -incubator, just like other projects in incubation
phase does.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Lukasz
>>>>
>>>>> +1, for making those sub-projects "official"
>>>>>
>>>>> Achim
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/9/5 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
>>>>>> Thanks for the update Andreas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is no hurry to make a release (moving as an "official" sub-project
>>>>>> doesn't mean to release asap :)).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/05/2011 08:14 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While karaf webconsole is not ready for a release rights now
I think we're
>>>>>>> sure enough about it. I think cave is a little bit closer to
the first
>>>>>>> release, but generally the same is valid is for the webconsole.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Therefore +1 to both
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards, Andreas
>>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2011 7:46 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"<jb@nanthrax.net>
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that we made good progress in WebConsole and Cave.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What do you think about promoting as Karaf sub-projects ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If we are OK, I will:
>>>>>>>> - move the svn directly under karaf root (as others sub-projects
like
>>>>>>>> Cellar)
>>>>>>>> - request git repo for both Cave and WebConsole
>>>>>>>> - create the corresponding Jira components and versions
>>>>>>>> - prepare the Karaf website update (including documentation)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thought ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Achim Nierbeck*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ------------------------
>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>> ------------------------
>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>>> ------------------------
>>> Open Source SOA
>>> http://fusesource.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> *Achim Nierbeck*
>
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>

Mime
View raw message