karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jamie G." <jamie.goody...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Size of karaf distributions
Date Mon, 02 Jan 2012 18:16:36 GMT
Running a quick diff on minimal and standard kits the largest
difference appears to be that the standard distribution includes demos
and a few extra jars in the system folder.

org.apache.karaf.region.commands-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -> 23K
org.apache.karaf.shell.config-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -> 43K
org.apache.karaf.shell.services-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -> 25K
org.apache.karaf.shell.ssh-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -> 38K
mina-core-2.0.3.jar -> 630K
sshd-core-0.6.0.jar -> 320K

When the above is removed then this accounts for the 1Mb reduction in
size to become 'minimal'.

Looking at the largest jars in the system folder we have:

2.3M org.apache.karaf.shell.dev-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
1.3M osgi-3.7.1.R37x_v20110808-1106.jar
2.5M pax-url-aether-1.3.5.jar

All other jars are under a Mb, the largest of which are:

367K org.apache.aries.blueprint.core-0.4.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
120K org.apache.aries.jmx-0.3.jar
104K org.apache.aries.util-0.5-SNAPSHOT.jar
206K commons-jexl-2.0.jar
470K org.apache.felix.framework-4.0.2.jar
379K org.apache.karaf.shell.console-3.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
630K mina-core-2.0.3.jar (Already cut from minimal)
213K org.apache.servicemix.bundles.asm-3.3_2.jar
320K sshd-core-0.6.0.jar (Already cut from minimal)
529K pax-logging-service-1.6.3.jar
332K pax-url-wrap-1.3.5.jar

Out of all the above jars I have to wonder why o.a.k.shell.dev is
2.3Mb in size, it's the second largest artifact in the kit.


On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
> I noticed that also, but I didn't find time to investigate why.
> I will take a look tonight to make a diff between distributions.
> Thanks !!
> Regards
> JB
> On 01/02/2012 06:17 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> The size of the karaf distribution has doubled between 2.x and 3.x.
>> It's now roughly 10 Mb.
>> Is that really worth the new features that are now embedded by default ?
>> I think at least the minimal distribution should be much lighter ...
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message