karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>
Subject Re: Add a scope feature-url
Date Tue, 22 May 2012 18:58:18 GMT
You are right. It will not be much of a difference still I have the 
feeling that mixing feature and feature-url is not ideal.

How about calling the feature-url commands repo like:

That should improve the tab completion. I would be missing the relation 
to features in that but it would be more usable.


Am 22.05.2012 18:44, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
> The idea of nesting sub shells seems interesting, but currently there is
> little need for it. As it already have been added it adds too much
> fragmentation.
> Now regarding to the original comment about separating the features:url-*
> commands. I think that it doesn't change much.
> Usually the user will type go by typing something like: feat<TAB>  ->
> features: and then press an other letter or two and complete the rest of
> the commands. So we have 2 tabs so far and maybe one more to specify
> url-add, url-remove etc. Total 3<TAB>s.
> If we add a new scope say: feature-url, then the user will go: feat<TAB>  ->
> features and then will need to either press ":" or "u" and<TAB>  again and
> so on.
> So in both cases we have the same ammount of effort unless the user types
> the whole scope and part of the command name by himself before using
> completion.
> So I don't see much of a difference.
> *
> **
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> **
> Twitter: iocanel
> *


Christian Schneider

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

View raw message