karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>
Subject Re: Add a scope feature-url
Date Tue, 22 May 2012 21:21:13 GMT
I agree for the short term. The danger that we only change it but not 
really make it better is quite high.
Still I have the feeling that it currently is not really optimal. I will 
give it some more thought.


Am 22.05.2012 21:21, schrieb Ioannis Canellos:
> In terms of completion this would make a difference. However, it is lacking
> context in my opinion.
> For example when a user sees the repo scope, he can be easily get confused
> and think that this refers to maven repos etc.
> Generally, speaking we need to be careful regarding the commands scope.
> If the scope is too generic, then it will gather a lot of commands under it
> and in the it will loose its purpose (such case were the osgi commands,
> they used to be an umbrella for many different things).
> On the other hand, if we normalize scopes too much and start
> splitting concepts across different scopes. the number of scope will be
> hard for the users to follow. Moreover, it will weaken the sub
> shells concept (there will be not much use to enter a subshells with only
> just a couple of commands).
> The key here is balance. I feel the currently the features scope is well
> balance and I think we should leave them as they are.


Christian Schneider

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

View raw message