karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote][WebConsole] Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules
Date Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:21:34 GMT
For Karaf 3.x

+1 for  the alpha release

+1 for looking for interested parties.

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com>wrote:

> Hi Lukasz,
>
> I'm also with JB so as a optional feature for 3.x
>
> and a
>
> +1 for  the alpha release
>
> +1 for looking for interested parties.
>
> even though the Karaf space may not be the best place for those
> additions I really would like to see those beeing available at least
> as "showcases"
>
> regards, Achim
>
> 2012/8/10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net>:
> > Hi Lukasz,
> >
> > we discussed about WebConsole during the 2nd Karaf Birthday call.
> >
> > I propose to include it asap on trunk to be able to include it in Karaf
> > 3.0.0, or at least in 3.1.0.
> >
> > Regarding the vote:
> >
> > +1 to release an alpha immediately and include it on trunk (it could be
> an
> > "optional" feature, having both webconsole (old style) and new webconsole
> > available)
> >
> > +0 for the other communities announcement. I'm agree but my concerning is
> > more about timing. Before announcing and promoting WebConsole, I would
> first
> > release a version which allow us to perform tests on it and be sure we
> are
> > OK.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 08/10/2012 02:51 PM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear all,
> >> Last year Andreas, Charles and I started working on Karaf WebConsole.
> >> Since then lots of things was done - almost complete support for OSGi
> >> management, switching to Wicket 1.5. Some of things still need to be
> done -
> >> complete Karaf modules, clean up or improve Config Admin / Events / Log
> /
> >> Blueprint pages. Branch for Karaf 3.0 (easy stuff). After that we
> should be
> >> ready to release stable version. Even now we can release early alpha to
> let
> >> 2.x users test webconsole and get involved in community.
> >>
> >> Outside core modules we have integrations with Camel / CXF and
> ServiceMix.
> >> These modules are not supported and was done by me as proof of
> concepts. For
> >> now there is no one who is interested in it. We should consider to
> announce
> >> existence of these modules or even Karaf WebConsole to other
> communities to
> >> get them involved in development. If we won't do that we may remove
> these
> >> modules as they will be not supported.
> >>
> >> Please take a vote in following two topics:
> >>
> >> Should WebConsole be early released:
> >> +1: Yes we should release alpha immediately
> >> 0: We should clean up code shortly and release
> >> -1: Wait untill getting stable codebase
> >>
> >> Should Camel / CXF / ServiceMix modules be announced to other
> communities:
> >> +1: Yes, we need to look for interested parties
> >> -1: No, we don't need them now, remove it
> >>
> >> I hope that vote will be also good occassion to discuss about
> WebConsole.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Lukasz
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer & Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
> Lead
> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>



-- 
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com
Twitter : @cmoulliard
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message