karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filippo Balicchia <fbalicc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git
Date Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:47:44 GMT
>From my point of view is +1
allows you to contribute immediately

Regards

--Filippo


2013/6/25 Jamie G. <jamie.goodyear@gmail.com>

> +1
>
> For clarification - all our generated artifacts will be signed, and a tag
> of our release created such that anyone could reproduce our release.
>
> The actual commit transaction to SCM is the only part that does not have a
> signature.
>
> As to the snapshots appearing in poms, Central Nexus will not allow us to
> release if it detects them during a promote - I do not believe however this
> is related to SCM, that's probably a configuration issue of the release
> plugin.
>
> Our release procedures and release check signatures scripts will need to be
> verified post change.
>
> -Jamie
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Łukasz Dywicki <luke@code-house.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven
> is
> > not afraid of git as well.
> >
> > I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than
> > they need. ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lukasz
> >
> > Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck <bcanhome@googlemail.com> w dniu
> > 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm
> > > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel
> > release.
> > > [1]
> > > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
> > > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.
> > >
> > > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1
> > >
> > > regards, Achim
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] -
> > >
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber <anpieber@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
> > >>
> > >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
> > >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >> Andreas
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jb@nanthrax.net
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> > >> formal
> > >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote to approve this switch:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> > >>>
> > >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>> --
> > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >>> jbonofre@apache.org
> > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
> Committer
> > &
> > > Project Lead
> > > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <
> http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
> > > Commiter & Project Lead
> > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message