karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: Minimal karaf distro
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:14:40 GMT
Hi Ioannis,

Good point, but, for instance, if Karaf requires Aries Blueprint (only 
for the namespace handler), it doesn't mean that we can't use another 
Blueprint implementation (like Gemini). Pushing namespace handlers out 
of the topic, it's already possible to use Gemini instead of Aries.
So, even if Karaf use Blueprint internally, it doesn't mean that you 
can't use (from an user perspective) another implementations or framework.


On 01/17/2014 10:55 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
>  From my point of view blueprint is fine. It does simplify things a lot
> and our users do use it. That doesn't mean that Karaf needs to use it
> too.
> Decoupling Karaf from blueprint, not only allows Karaf to have a
> smaller footprint, but also allows provides more flexibility since
> Karaf could be used with different versions/implementations of
> Blueprint etc.
> So this is actually a "step forward".

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message