karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>
Subject Re: Minimal karaf distro
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:13:23 GMT
That is correct. Using blueprint does not block the user from using 
other frameworks but blueprint has a quite big foot print. It has 
several jars itself and also needs aries proxy. Besides that we had a 
lot of blueprint or proxy related issues recently. So I really see a 
benefit of changing to DS. ... I only hope DS does not have similar 
issues :-)


On 17.01.2014 11:14, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Ioannis,
> Good point, but, for instance, if Karaf requires Aries Blueprint (only 
> for the namespace handler), it doesn't mean that we can't use another 
> Blueprint implementation (like Gemini). Pushing namespace handlers out 
> of the topic, it's already possible to use Gemini instead of Aries.
> So, even if Karaf use Blueprint internally, it doesn't mean that you 
> can't use (from an user perspective) another implementations or 
> framework.
> Regards
> JB

Christian Schneider

Open Source Architect

View raw message