karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Minimal karaf distro
Date Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:59:51 GMT
This step forward can only be achieved if we move from blueprint to DS, but
not
back to do the plumbing ourselfs.

regards, Achim


2014/1/17 Ioannis Canellos <iocanel@gmail.com>

> From my point of view blueprint is fine. It does simplify things a lot
> and our users do use it. That doesn't mean that Karaf needs to use it
> too.
> Decoupling Karaf from blueprint, not only allows Karaf to have a
> smaller footprint, but also allows provides more flexibility since
> Karaf could be used with different versions/implementations of
> Blueprint etc.
> So this is actually a "step forward".
>
>
> --
> Ioannis Canellos
>
> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
> Twitter: iocanel
>



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message