karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: Minimal karaf distro
Date Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:57:03 GMT
Hi Xav,

That's why I propose the first step with net/minimal/core distributions.

But, I think targeting the minimum footprint should not be a final goal. 
I mean, of course, we have to be careful on the footprint, but honestly, 
look at the footprint now, and look at the features that we provide: 
it's not so bad (compare with other containers or application servers ;)).

So, I think we are inline: careful on the footprint, but keep a good 
provided features level.


On 02/05/2014 10:37 AM, xav wrote:
> Hi all,
> I discussed with Jean-Batiste and Christian on this subject. Here my point
> of view:
> We use Karaf in my project, to having feature and etc.. But we don't use
> blueprint (we use Ipojo), and one a main goal is: have a application based
> on osgi, and have a footprint minimalist (not more 10 Mo for the OSGI
> container). The problem, now with the karaf distribution, is we took lot of
> bundle for nothing (for my project of course), and the size of my
> application is very large, and it's a big problem for me.
> Regards
> --
> View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Minimal-karaf-distro-tp4031073p4031526.html
> Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Talend - http://www.talend.com

View raw message