karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Karaf Boot
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:15:57 GMT
People can always "override" the version from the parent pom.

But the point is that devs may don't care about the underlying versions: 
they just use karaf-boot x.x.x.

Regards
JB

On 09/10/2015 07:05 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
> One concern I have with the approach of providing all in one is that it
> does not give the user flexibility.
> The pom will be tied to specific versions of aries, cxf, karaf.
>
> If you then need a new cxf version it can be even more complicated than
> without karaf boot.
> There is also the difficulty of supporting changes in dependent projects
> over time. For example in maven-blueprint-plugin I have create different
> xml for aries jpa 1.x or 2.x.
> So I think in the long run it does not work with the key trun approach.
>
> While people do not need this flexibility at the start they need it once
> they have grown a bit.
> Approaches like spring roo that create resources and change them work
> better in that regard as the user still has full control over the end
> result.
>
> In any case I am looking forward to see your implementation in action.
>
> Christian
>
> Am 10.09.2015 um 18:42 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:
>> Why not, as soon as we provide a valid default configuration in
>> karaf-boot-parent.
>>
>> I'm afraid that this approach is still too low level/technical. The
>> purpose of karaf-boot is to be "key turn": just inherit from the pom,
>> use annotation: bang it's done.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message