karaf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Baptiste Onofré ...@nanthrax.net>
Subject Re: The future of gemini-blueprint, take 2 + results
Date Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:09:32 GMT
Bye ;)

Regards
JB

On 12/19/2016 04:12 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
> Hell,
>
> OK, back to this issue. I built entire Karaf 4.1 with (i)tests using
> "-Dmaven.repo.local=/work/.m2" after removal of gemini-blueprint features
> and repositories. I had to remove hibernate 3.x features as well to make
> the build pass.
>
> The result is (`find .m2 -name _remote.repositories|xargs grep '>'|cut -d
> '>' -f 2|sort|uniq`):
>  - /work/.m2 is 746MB size
>  - there are artifacts from 3 different remote repos:
>     - 1
> (.m2/com/sun/winsw/winsw/1.18/_remote.repositories:winsw-1.18-bin.exe) from
> "jenkins"
>     - 2 (org.apache.aries.proxy.impl/1.0.6-SNAPSHOT and
> org.apache.felix.gogo.runtime/1.0.1-SNAPSHOT) from "apache-snapshots"
>     - 882 JARs and 1353 POMs from "central"
>
> Looks good to me. Any last words for gemini/hibernate3?
>
> regards
> Grzegorz
>
> 2016-10-18 6:43 GMT+02:00 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com.invalid>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> david jencks
>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:33 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzybek@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4774 to
>> consider
>>> deprecation/removal of gemini-blueprint support.
>>>
>>> I had this idea after reviewing Maven usage in Karaf4. Currently there's
>>> following configuration of remote repositories:
>>>
>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.mvn.repositories= \
>>>>    http://repo1.maven.org/maven2@id=central, \
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=spring.ebr.
>> release,
>>>> \
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring.
>> ebr.external,
>>>> \
>>>>    http://zodiac.springsource.com/maven/bundles/release@id=gemini, \
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots-
>> group@id=apache@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>> \
>>>>
>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots@id=sonatype.
>> snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>> \
>>>>
>>>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-
>> snapshots@id=ops4j.sonatype.snapshots.deploy@snapshots@noreleases,
>>>> \
>>>>
>>>> http://repository.springsource.com/maven/bundles/external@id=spring-
>> ebr-repository@snapshots@noreleases
>>>>
>>>
>>> 4 repositories are SpringSource ones and FAQ on their site says:
>>>
>>> *What is the current status of the repository?*
>>>>
>>>> The repository is frozen but will remain accessible *until at least 1
>>>> September 2014*. See http://www.eclipse.org/ebr/ for information
>>>> regarding the Eclipse Bundle Recipes project to which users of the
>>>> SpringSource Enterprise Bundle Repository should transition.
>>>>
>>>
>>> These 4 (3 for non-snapshots) repositories are queried during all
>>> Maven/Aether resolutions.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's time to remove gemini-blueprint? What do you think?
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>>
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Mime
View raw message