logging-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikael Ståldal <mik...@staldal.nu>
Subject Re: Revisiting the binary logging format idea
Date Sat, 21 Oct 2017 14:04:54 GMT
On 2017-10-20 06:36, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 19 October 2017 at 14:05, Mikael Ståldal <mikes@apache.org> wrote:
>> And don't forget a corresponding LogEventParser.
> Right. The basic idea here would be to provide both a reference encoder and
> decoder. If an existing binary format such as BSON, Avro, or Thrift were
> appropriate, then there wouldn't be much need here other than publishing a
> schema, but all 3 of those projects create non-trivial garbage during
> encoding and don't really have a use case in minimal memory usage or high
> performance encoding like we strive for in log4j.

What about Google's Protocol buffers?

View raw message