logging-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [log4j] Move JDBC appender to own module?
Date Sat, 13 Jan 2018 17:54:07 GMT
On Jan 13, 2018 09:54, "Mikael Ståldal" <mikes@apache.org> wrote:

As usual, I think we should avoid optional dependencies.

That means more modules.

Maybe we can start small here with a log4j-jpa module.


On 2018-01-13 10:16, Remko Popma wrote:

> I meant to keep the jdbc and the generic db package together.
> log4j-db:  generic db + jdbc
> log4j-jpa: requires javax.persistance
> We can also keep all of these in a single module `log4j-db` with an
> optional dependency on javax.persistance.
> More modules gives more flexibility but also more complexity, so I lean
> towards keeping things together where possible until the flexibility is
> really needed.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message