logging-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Chainsaw 2.0.0-rc1
Date Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:47:46 GMT
Matt, would you mind re-spinning a new build at 2.1.0-rc1?

On 1/19/18, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy@gmail.com> wrote:
> I finally looked at this.  I pushed a change to app assembler config
> to make the bin directory executable, and updated HOWTOBUILD to
> mention you need to run mvn site:site first.
>
> Can we resin?
>
> On 11/13/17, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Another thing I noticed is that the downloads page needs to be updated to
>> link to the (future) dist URLs instead of ones in the site's directory
>> (no
>> proper mirroring in the old links).
>>
>> On 12 November 2017 at 19:25, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall why - it was a while back :)
>>>
>>> Yes, I think 2.1.0-rc1 would make sense, once we fix the /bin directory
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> On 11/12/17, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On 12 November 2017 at 13:53, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (info.plist, release
>>> >> notes, couple other places).
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Any particular reason?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Would it be easiest to release the new version as 2.1.0.0 instead of
>>> >> 2.0.0-rc1?  Otherwise I could downgrade 2.1 refs, we never had an
>>> >> official release with that rev.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I could re-roll as 2.1.0-rc1 (or rc2?). I chose 2.0.0 since there's no
>>> tags
>>> > or releases for any 2.x release at all, so it seemed like a logical
>>> > starting point.
>>> >
>>> > And thanks for testing! We should be able to clean up for a proper 2.x
>>> > release. :)
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message