logging-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikael Ståldal <mi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [log4j] The shape of Log4j
Date Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:24:07 GMT
Yes, neither Git nor Maven is optimal for mono-repos since you can only 
tag/branch the whole repo, and only have one version for the whole build.

Google have a big mono-repo, but they do not use Git, nor Maven.

I think we should release and version everything in one repo together, 
otherwise it will get very messy.


On 2018-01-22 22:58, Matt Sicker wrote:
> Using Maven profiles could help, though when tagging a release, if we
> didn't release every module within, then it'd get out of sync anyways. Then
> it would still require building every single component in each release,
> even when said components haven't changed at all.
> 
> On 22 January 2018 at 15:50, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Coming back around to the idea of One Repo to Rule Them All*TM* ... what if
>> we used Maven profiles to separate out the "main" build from "other"
>> builds?
>>
>> All that is needed to move modules from one build to another is just to
>> edit the profile!

Mime
View raw message