logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28908] - Oracle.sql incorrect
Date Tue, 11 May 2004 22:40:15 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908

Oracle.sql incorrect





------- Additional Comments From paul.smith@lawlex.com.au  2004-05-11 22:40 -------
Diff's can be hard to read, but is this basically changing all 'int' columns to 
INTEGER(10) and BIGINTS to INTEGER(20)?

If this is the case, then I would +1 this patch, in fact, I'd recommend the use 
of Integer over int/bigint any day, mainly because of some postgres weirdness 
that burnt me to a crisp one day.

However the patch seems to have lots-o-white-space, so rather than apply the 
patch as such, should I apply your recommendation of changing the int/bigints 
to number?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message