logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacob Kjome <h...@visi.com>
Subject RE: socketappender stacktrace, is it necessary?
Date Mon, 10 May 2004 04:11:00 GMT
At 08:32 AM 5/10/2004 +1000, you wrote:
>To: 'Log4J Developers List' <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
>Subject: RE: socketappender stacktrace, is it necessary?
>
>This has been bugging me for ages too.. Just committed a change.  I think
>it's still an ERROR level, but doesn't log the full trace.  The message
>though does contain the underlying exception message, so it's still pretty
>useful.  Maybe a property on the appender if you DON'T want it to nag on
>error?
>
>This could be controversial, but I'm in agreement with Jacob on this one.
>
>cheers,
>
>Paul Smith

Thanks Paul!

Jake 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message