logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mark Womack" <mwom...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes on 1.2 branch
Date Wed, 04 May 2005 14:03:26 GMT
Actually, you beat me to this, but I have a slight alteration to your 
proposal:

Current 1.2 branch is tagged/moved to a new branch called 1_2_slf4j and will 
be available for modification and "experimental" slf4j builds.  The "head" 
of the 1.2 branch is reverted to the previous v1.2.9 state.  At that point 
we will be in a position to continue work on the slf4j, whatever it will be, 
and to start on a new 1.2 release if we decide to do so.
Are you still +1 with the above modifications?

-Mark


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Curt Arnold" <carnold@apache.org>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Tag the CVS for 1.2.10 and revert the slf4j related changes 
on 1.2 branch


> No CVS tags appeared to be applied to the CVS for the recalled 1.2.10 
> release.  The SLF4J patches were fairly small and can be reapplied if and 
> when direct implementation of SLF4J is desired for the 1.2 branch.  I'd 
> suggest tagging the CVS for 1.2.10 as v1_2_10_recalled and reverting the 
> Logger and Category changes.
>
> +1
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message