logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com>
Subject RE: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:03:27 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:hoju@visi.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:11 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: 1.3 - A Line in the Sand
> At 07:07 PM 4/2/2007, you wrote:
>  >At some point we can no longer ignore the decision about where 1.3
>  >should go.
>  >
>  >I am beginning to think that we should scale back 1.3 to be less of
>  >the planned revolution and more of a substantial-update-but-
>  >completely-backward compatible (to a point).
>  >
> I think it's been said before that 1.3 may be more of a dead end than
> anything else.  Some interesting things went into it, but the fact
> that it became so incompatible with Log4j-1.2.xx is a real
> problem.  Is it worth a release or do we just leave it as-is, forever
> alpha, and move on to 2.0?

We currently use 1.3 Alpha-7 and it works pretty well for us, my preference as a user would
be to clean up the current alpha for release as 1.3 or call it 2.0 if it is not binary compatible
with the latest 1.2.14.

In general, I dislike "big bang" releases and favor instead release early, release often,
a la XP.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message