logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Paul Smith (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LOG4J2-9) log4j 2.0 should leverage existing (preferably ASF) configuration frameworks
Date Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:05:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-9?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12607124#action_12607124
] 

Paul Smith commented on LOG4J2-9:
---------------------------------

We should consider Spring as part of this configuration too.  I don't have anything off the
top of my head in mind here,but since Spring is such a rich configuration environment we should
probably not ignore how log4j may fit into a Spring environment.

> log4j 2.0 should leverage existing (preferably ASF) configuration frameworks
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-9
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-9
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Configurators
>            Reporter: Curt Arnold
>
> log4j 2.0 should avoid implementing its own configuration framework in preference to
being compatible with commonly used configuration frameworks and services.  Compatibility
with existing log4j 1.2 configuration files might be accomplished by XSLT transforms that
convert the legacy format into the equivalent with the selected configuration framework. 
log4j 2.0 should be readily configurable with JMX and a JMX centric design for configuration
may be desirable.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message