logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Missing commit messages for rev 1158186 1159577, 1159583
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:03:29 GMT
+1 I agree with Christian on this...I believe we can go forward with
exclusively maven for companions...although to be honest it seems having
companions at all seems a little overkill..it's a few extra classes..seems
size was the main driver?

Pulling old Chainsaw and lf5 out of core would have probably made up for the
difference..but hey, that ship has sailed...maybe they could all be pulled
into extras (component and receivers?)


On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello Curt,
> > On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:12 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
> >
> >> We've supported both building with either Ant or Maven for many years,
> though releases have been exclusively Maven for a while. The Ant build and
> test scripts were necessary to build and test on JDK 1.3 and earlier (which
> also required an earlier version of Ant, though I forget the specific
> version), but that is obviously less of a concern than it was long time ago.
> As far as I can tell, the Ant build works and isn't hurting anyone, so I'd
> be inclined to keep it around at least until there is a some discussion to
> remove Ant as a build environment.
> It seems you have missed my prewarning before I did the change:
> http://bit.ly/oUAy1R
> I saw commons testing on jdk 1.3:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml
> (scroll down to the profiles)
> Then I would like to point you to the discussion on the JDK 1.3:
> http://bit.ly/nDMN7f
> Maybe we have supported Ant for many years. But companions are just a
> few classes and honstely, do we really expect a second release of
> them? I do not. My suggestion is and was to stip off everything which
> is not necessary. The ant build and the usage of ant within maven
> makes the pom.xml hard to read. The whole build is somewhat complex
> compared to other maven projects. I doubt the sense behind it - at
> least we are speaking of only a few files in each project.
> In addition, I can't open the project with JDK1.3 compiler settings in
> eclipse. It is simply to old. I have suggested to level at least to
> 1.4. Since companions has not been released so far, it should not
> cause any trouble. JDK 1.3 users are lost these days. For good
> reasons. If people still survive with JDK 1.3, they probably don't
> need companions. They need prayers, each day. ;-)
> > There were also a couple of other scenarios where it was handy to have
> the Ant scripts around. The ant scripts allowed you to test without
> rebuilding which was handy to check that the jar that you built on the
> release platform worked on other platforms. I'm not sure how easily that can
> be accomplished with Maven as I think it is going to want to rebuild the jar
> first. Also, I recall some JVM (JRocket, Geronimo, gcj) not running Maven,
> but able to build and test with Ant.
> Maven 2 and 3 is pretty stable and widely spread. Even at Commons
> Maven is the standard - a project were components need to work for all
> environments. I have not heard that JRocket and others cannot run
> Maven. I could not find any references when googling. Somebody said,
> JRockit + Maven has a poor performance. But anyway - it is not likely
> that companions users will download the sources and compile themself.
> Honestly I do not expect a single download except when Scott builds
> his Chainsaw. :-)
> In addition, mvn test works very well for me. Testing (at least to my
> knowledge) does not happen with a jar file, it happens on the compiled
> classes. Even when we need to build a jar on each test, no problem
> with 3 classes in a project.
> Summarizing, I don't think we need the features you outlined. We
> should make a quick release now. If we need a feature which is not
> provided by maven, we can put it into the code later. And as a second
> release is very unlikely...
> Would be nice to hear other voices on this one.
> Cheers
> Christian
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message