logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <curt.ar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1159035 - /logging/log4j/trunk/pom.xml
Date Fri, 19 Aug 2011 04:02:50 GMT

On Aug 18, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:

> I think the main reason for antrun is to enhance the generated site
> afterwards, and probably for publishing.
> Most other stuff can be done with maven, so I would give my +1 to
> reduce the Ant dependency to a minimum - again.
> 
> Imho antrun should not do any tests
> 

If I remember correctly, the reason antrun was used over the junit plugin, is that the log4j
unit tests have side effects (typically leaving files around) and changing the order that
tests are run can cause tests to fail. Not that way that it should be, but the way it was.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message