logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Companions -> Chainsaw?
Date Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:15:22 GMT
I think pulling in component would make sense...no one else probably uses
it.  Receivers?  I suppose if they were built as a separate jar that'd be
fine too, I have no idea who uses them if anyone.

Scott

On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>wrote:

> At this point I'm only focusing only on 2.0. I've been wondering if I
> should create a subproject for chainsaw or if it should remain separate. I
> already moved a large part of extras in as a core part of the functionality.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > Scott,
> >
> > Curt had an interesting idea lately, he mentioned it might make sense
> > to move the companions code into chainsaw.
> > What do you think on that?
> >
> > I like the idea - less releases, and no other interested parties in
> > having companions.
> >
> > Please comment, when you can :-)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Christian
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message