logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tushar Kapila <tgkp...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Berkeley DB for Java
Date Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:08:33 GMT
would a memory mapped file as the back end for the db help?
If you can use j7 why not the in built one - apache.
We use a db mapped to ram (linux) server restart would be catatrophe but
works great for debug logs.
On Mar 5, 2013 12:02 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> Do you have personal experience with any of these?
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 1:19 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
>
> > On 2013-03-02 19:15, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >> Does anyone have experience using Berkeley DB for Java?  I am looking
> at creating something similar to the embedded Flume appender using Berkeley
> DB as the "file channel" so that I don't have to bring in all the Flume
> dependencies and the socket connection to Flume can be done asynchronously.
>  In effect, I would be using Berkeley DB as the queue between the client
> and the asynchronous portion of the Appender.
> >>
> >> I'd like to know if I am opening myself up for problems in doing this
> so if anyone has experience with using it I'd like to know about them.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > If you want something really simply, then something like one of these
> should fit the bill: ( in order of increasing complexity)
> >
> > http://www.gaborcselle.com/open_source/java/persistent_queue.html
> > http://www.michaelgoldschmidt.eu/memoryfilebackedqueue/index.html
> > http://www.metanotion.net/software/sandbox/block.html
> > http://jdbm.sourceforge.net/
> >
> >
> >
> > Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message