logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: custom loggers
Date Mon, 07 Jul 2014 14:44:14 GMT
Well, yes, but it feels wrong to fatten up the API jar with tooling. I
could see adding it in core though, maybe.

Gary


On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:

> I see what you mean but it seems overkill to create a new module for just
> one class...
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this should be in the API module or any other current
>> module since it is a development time thing. I am not a fan of adding yet
>> another module (log4j-tools?) but it might be the cleanest way.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Remko Popma
>> Date:07/06/2014 09:29 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Log4J Developers List
>> Subject: custom loggers
>>
>> I asked this in the LOG4J2-519 comments
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-519?focusedCommentId=14050071&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14050071>,
>> but perhaps the mailing list is a better forum...
>>
>> Does anyone object if I commit the tool to generate custom/extended
>> loggers to the org.apache.logging.log4j.util package in the log4j-api
>> module?
>>
>> (For detail see the above Jira comment.)
>>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
View raw message