logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikael Ståldal (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-778) logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author
Date Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:01:29 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100505#comment-14100505
] 

Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-778:
---------------------------------------

Were these recommendations from Ceki made recently, after the final release of Log4j 2.0?

> logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-778
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: SIBISH BASHEER
>              Labels: log4j, logback
>
> Hi log4j2 Team,
> If you remember, i had developed a custom logger for splunk based on log4j2 with the
log4j2 team's help and had presented to my architects. Unfortunately the decision from the
architects was not to use log4j2 because of the reason that log4j main author recommends logback
not log4j2.
> Have you heard of any such statements and if there is any scenario where logback is better
than log4j2?
> Thanks
> Sibish



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message