logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Advice on package for Encoder and ByteBufferDestination
Date Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:31:00 GMT
And I imagine that _moving_ Layout is too much of a BC break even though it
is in Core?

Gary

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
wrote:

> IMO, the oddness is that Layout is NOT in the layout package. So I would
> leave all layout items in layout...
>
> Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What package should the Encoder and ByteBufferDestination interfaces live
>> in?
>>
>> Currently they are both in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout, but
>> o.a.l.l.core.Layout extends Encoder and it seems a bit strange to have
>> Layout's super interface live in a subpackage.
>>
>> I think there are pros and cons to leaving them in the layout package or
>> pulling them up to the core package, but I'd be interested to hear
>> everyone's feedback.
>>
>> Remko
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
View raw message