logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Advice on package for Encoder and ByteBufferDestination
Date Sun, 03 Apr 2016 17:40:05 GMT
IMO, the oddness is that Layout is NOT in the layout package. So I would
leave all layout items in layout...


On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:

> What package should the Encoder and ByteBufferDestination interfaces live
> in?
> Currently they are both in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout, but
> o.a.l.l.core.Layout extends Encoder and it seems a bit strange to have
> Layout's super interface live in a subpackage.
> I think there are pros and cons to leaving them in the layout package or
> pulling them up to the core package, but I'd be interested to hear
> everyone's feedback.
> Remko

E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

View raw message