logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gulcu <c...@qos.ch>
Subject RE: best to start with 1.1.3 or 1.2 ?
Date Thu, 13 Dec 2001 01:45:05 GMT

Early 2002 is my guess.

At 18:03 12.12.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Any estimate on when 1.2 will no longer be alpha?  The "alpha" is
>prohibiting us from upgrading.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Ray
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ceki Gulcu [SMTP:ceki@qos.ch]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:09 PM
>> To:   Log4J Users List
>> Subject:      Re: best to start with 1.1.3 or 1.2 ?
>> 
>> 
>> I suggest you go with log4j 1.2.  It's marked alpha but is quite stable.
>> 
>> At 08:41 12.12.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>> >I want to start using Log4J in a project
>> >(currently in development, production in 1-3 months)
>> >
>> >I would prefer to start and learn using the newer 1.2 version
>> >which is, as I understand it, much closer to the logging
>> >to be included in Java 1.4.
>> >
>> >1) Is Log4J 1.2 ready or will very shortly be ready for this?
>> >
>> >2) If not, is moving from 1.1.3 to 1.2 (or Java 1.4)
>> >primarily new names or is it major change?
>> 
>> There are naming changes and many internal changes transparent to the
>> user. Log4j 1.2 can be considered as a plug-in replacement for 1.1.3 in
>> the vast majority of cases.
>> 
>> >3) Is there any rough ideas about the 1.2 roadmap?
>> 
>> No, there is none. Ceki
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> <mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message