logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <c...@qos.ch>
Subject Re: A possible BUG? Logger vs category tag in xml (DOMConfigurator)
Date Mon, 14 Jul 2003 20:44:18 GMT

This subject has been discussed many times in the past. Please refer
to the archives.

No, it is not a bug. Subclassing logger class is discouraged. Consequently,
the logger tag does not allow for a class attribute. However, you can
get around this by various means which I am not going to disclose here
as the means are deprecated, discouraged or both.

I recommend wrapping instead of sub-classing.

At 12:21 PM 7/14/2003 -0700, Sanjay Gupta (sanjaygu) wrote:

>I am trying to subclass Logger(Category) & LoggerFactory and use
>DOMConfigurator(log4j.xml). I ran into interesting problem. My stuff
>works fine when I configure the logger from program i.e. not using a xml
>or properties file.
>But when I use xml file, it turns out that <logger> tag does not have a
>way of specifying class so My subclassed Logger never gets instanciated.
>I digged deeper and figured out that <category> tag has "class"
>So, now I am confused. Should I subclass Logger or Category. If I should
>subclass Logger then how can I make sure that my subclassed Logger gets
>instanciated from the log4j.xml and not org.apache.log4j.Logger?
>I think that it might be a bug?

Ceki  For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
       ISBN: 2970036908  http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message