logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Smith <paul.sm...@lawlex.com.au>
Subject RE: [Chainsaw]: Ant-based installer
Date Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:02:12 GMT

> I noticed that behaviour, is there a reason.  It's a bit annoying to have to
> turn off each sub-logger.  When configuring loggers, if you set a logger to
> FATAL, then all sub-loggers are converted to FATAL, right??  Shouldn't
> chainsaw replicate this idea.
> 
> Most times nodes in a logger tree are packages, while the leaves are actual
> classes.  It would be nice to ignore an entire package, like utils or
> something.
> 
> I can see both cases, but wondered why you went with explicit logger
> ignoring..

Had thought of this, but imagine you had wanted to ignore a top level
package, but not the children....

It needs some more work to handle both cases.  Be nice to have a Ignore
+ all children, and the reverse...

We'll get there.

cheers,

Paul


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message