logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <c...@qos.ch>
Subject Re: Unexpected logger ancestor
Date Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:44:47 GMT
At 06:06 PM 12/10/2003 +0000, tom ONeill wrote:
>>No, absolutely not.
>>
>>X.Z and Y.Z should bear no relation to each other except their common 
>>ancestor the 'root' logger.
>>
>>Does that answer your question?
>
>
>Thanks for your help Ceki....
>
>So you are saying that my "Y.Z" logger should not be created as "X.Y.Z" 
>just because I already have a logger "X.Z"?. Therefore what I am seeing is 
>some kind of error and not the expected behaviour? If I know it is an 
>error I can now go and try find what is causing the problem.

I confirm. It is an error.

>My configuration is pretty straightforward so I doubt thats the issue. 
>However I am using my own logger implementation (it extends Logger) so 
>maybe somthing in there is causing the problem. Perhaps I have overridden 
>one of Loggers methods incorrectly......

Hmm, maybe the problem is in your wrapper. Just a cynical thought...


-- 
Ceki Gülcü

      For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
      ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp  



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message