logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yu Xiang Xi (Maveo)" <y...@Maveosystems.com>
Subject Thinking about log4j performance
Date Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:32:16 GMT
It's known that log4j has a good performance even 'on an AMD Duron clocked
at 800Mhz running JDK 1.3.1' machine.

If I have lot of appenders, for example, a socket appender, which will cost
0.1 second to communicate with the socket server, and there's still a file
appender in the system all the same.

My puzzle is that, will socket appender and file appender work at the same
Or run socket appender first, and AFTER socket appender done, file appender
And the system will hold on till all the appenders are invoked?

Might it can be explained in the below assumption codes.
methodA();                      //(1)
logger.debug("hello,log4j")     //(2) hold on till all appenders are invoked
one by one?
methodB();                      //(3)

Best Regards
Xi Yuxiang
System Architect
Maveo Systems Limited - www.maveosystems.com
Email: yxxi@maveosystems.com 

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message