logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacob Kjome <h...@visi.com>
Subject Re: best practice question: webapp relative filenames in FileAppenders
Date Fri, 12 Nov 2004 05:14:34 GMT
Why not use a system property and reference it in your config using the 
usual ${someproperty} syntax.  For instance...


If you want it to be dynamic per webapp, then you can set the system 
property in a servlet context listener and then perform the manual 
configuration of Log4j.

And if you are configuring manually via a startup servlet, why put 
log4j.properties in the classpath?  It would get picked up there 
automatically anyway (at least under a server using child-first 
classloading behavior recommended by the servlet spec) assuming log4j.jar 
is also in WEB-INF/lib.


At 05:02 PM 11/11/2004 -0800, you wrote:
 >I want to use log4j to configure my webapp to write log files underneath
 >it's WEB-INF directory.
 >Today, I drop a log4j.properties file in WEB-INF/classes and I
 >use code in the initialization of a servlet to programmatically fill in
 >the .File property for a FileAppender (or a subclass of FileAppender)
 >It would be nice if there was a way to specify the dir that the
 >pathnames parsed in log4j.properties were relative to or some other
 >technique for having the logfiles be relative to the webapp w/out
 >writing code.
 >Any advice?
 >To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
 >For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message