logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arthur Blake <blake...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Great product like log4j stagnant?
Date Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:02:19 GMT
I thought logback would be the eventual replacement of log4j...


----- Original Message ----
From: Wayne Cannon <wcannon@turinnetworks.com>
To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2007 11:43:28 AM
Subject: Great product like log4j stagnant?

In a different thread, Steve Souza said that log4j development had 
stagnated (my words, not his, re version 1.3).  Is this true?  If this 
is true, is it simply because log4j is a mature product and is a good 
product needing little ongoing development effort of significance, or is 
there a new/replacement product carrying the de facto logging charter 
into the future (e.g. compatible with commons-logging)?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org

Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto
Green Center.
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message